• Mary Hawk, Vishwajit Nimgaonkar, Triptish Bhatia, Jaspreet S Brar, Wafaa Abdelhakim Elbahaey, James E Egan, Prasad Konasale, Supriya Kumar, Margaret C McDonald, Ravinder Singh, Soumya Swaminathan, Joel Wood, and Smita N Deshpande.
• Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, Evaluation Institute for Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, 4136 Parran Hall - 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, United States of America. meh96@pitt.edu.
• Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Oct 24; 15 (1): 92.

BackgroundThere is a critical gap between needs and available resources for mental health treatment across the world, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In countries committed to increasing resources to address these needs it is important to conduct research, not only to assess the depth of mental health needs and the current provision of public and private mental health services, but also to examine implementation methods and evaluate mental health approaches to determine which methods are most effective in local contexts. However, research resources in many LMICs are inadequate, largely because conventional research training is time-consuming and expensive. Adapting a hackathon model may be a feasible method of increasing capacity for mental health services research in resource-poor countries.MethodsTo explore the feasibility of this approach, we developed a 'grantathon', i.e. a research training workshop, to build capacity among new investigators on implementation research of Indian government-funded mental health programmes, which was based on a need expressed by government agencies. The workshop was conducted in Delhi, India, and brought together junior faculty members working in mental health services settings throughout the country, experienced international behavioural health researchers and representatives of the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR), the prime Indian medical research funding agency. Pre- and post-assessments were used to capture changes in participants' perceived abilities to develop proposals, design research studies, evaluate outcomes and develop collaborations with ICMR and other researchers. Process measures were used to track the number of single-or multi-site proposals that were generated and funded.ResultsParticipants (n = 24) generated 12 single- or multi-site research grant applications that will be funded by ICMR.ConclusionThe grantathon model described herein can be modified to build mental health services research capacity in other contexts. Given that this workshop not only was conceptualised and delivered but also returned results in less than 1 year, this model has the potential to quickly build research capacity and ultimately reduce the mental health treatment gap in resource-limited settings.

16 keywords...

hide…