• Journal of critical care · Dec 2021

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Utilization and effect of neuromuscular blockade in a randomized trial of high-frequency oscillation.

    • Sangeeta Mehta, Qi Zhou, Ruxandra Pinto, Jan O Friedrich, François Lamontagne, Niall D Ferguson, Maureen O Meade, AdhikariNeill K JNKJDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and Institute for Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada., and OSCILLATE Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.
    • Department of Medicine, Sinai Health, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: geeta.mehta@utoronto.ca.
    • J Crit Care. 2021 Dec 1; 66: 86-92.

    PurposeWe evaluated characteristics associated with neuromuscular blockade (NMB) use, center-level variation, and whether NMB mediated excess mortality among patients assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in the OSCILLATE trial.Materials And MethodsNMB exposure was defined as receipt after randomization; the primary outcome was hospital mortality. Descriptive analyses compared NMB-exposed vs unexposed patients. Multivariable analyses included patients not on baseline NMB. Cox regression evaluated associations of patient- and center-level variables with NMB use. A log-normal frailty model evaluated center effects. Mediation analysis examined the effect of NMB in HFOV-assigned patients.Results376/548 patients (39 centers) received post-randomization NMB, of whom 165 received baseline NMB. Patients receiving post-randomization NMB (vs. not) had worse lung mechanics and gas exchange, received more sedation and vasopressors (p < 0.05), and had higher hospital mortality (44% vs. 34%, p = 0.03). Mean airway pressure ≥ 24 cmH2O, randomization to HFOV, and intensive care unit size ≥ 31 beds were associated with post-randomization NMB. After adjustment, center had a negligible effect on post-randomization NMB (median hazard ratio 1.01, p = 0.047). NMB use did not mediate excess mortality among HFOV-allocated patients (p = 0.80).ConclusionsIn OSCILLATE, receipt of post-randomization NMB was associated with worse outcomes, but NMB use did not mediate HFOV-associated higher mortality.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…