-
Journal of critical care · Dec 2021
Randomized Controlled TrialUtilization and effect of neuromuscular blockade in a randomized trial of high-frequency oscillation.
- Sangeeta Mehta, Qi Zhou, Ruxandra Pinto, Jan O Friedrich, François Lamontagne, Niall D Ferguson, Maureen O Meade, AdhikariNeill K JNKJDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and Institute for Health Policy, Management & Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada., and OSCILLATE Investigators and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.
- Department of Medicine, Sinai Health, Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: geeta.mehta@utoronto.ca.
- J Crit Care. 2021 Dec 1; 66: 86-92.
PurposeWe evaluated characteristics associated with neuromuscular blockade (NMB) use, center-level variation, and whether NMB mediated excess mortality among patients assigned to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) in the OSCILLATE trial.Materials And MethodsNMB exposure was defined as receipt after randomization; the primary outcome was hospital mortality. Descriptive analyses compared NMB-exposed vs unexposed patients. Multivariable analyses included patients not on baseline NMB. Cox regression evaluated associations of patient- and center-level variables with NMB use. A log-normal frailty model evaluated center effects. Mediation analysis examined the effect of NMB in HFOV-assigned patients.Results376/548 patients (39 centers) received post-randomization NMB, of whom 165 received baseline NMB. Patients receiving post-randomization NMB (vs. not) had worse lung mechanics and gas exchange, received more sedation and vasopressors (p < 0.05), and had higher hospital mortality (44% vs. 34%, p = 0.03). Mean airway pressure ≥ 24 cmH2O, randomization to HFOV, and intensive care unit size ≥ 31 beds were associated with post-randomization NMB. After adjustment, center had a negligible effect on post-randomization NMB (median hazard ratio 1.01, p = 0.047). NMB use did not mediate excess mortality among HFOV-allocated patients (p = 0.80).ConclusionsIn OSCILLATE, receipt of post-randomization NMB was associated with worse outcomes, but NMB use did not mediate HFOV-associated higher mortality.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.