• Vaccine · Jul 2020

    Impact of Australian mandatory 'No Jab, No Pay' and 'No Jab, No Play' immunisation policies on immunisation services, parental attitudes to vaccination and vaccine uptake, in a tertiary paediatric hospital, the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne.

    • Raffaela Armiento, Monsurul Hoq, Eugene Kua, Nigel Crawford, Kirsten P Perrett, Sonja Elia, and Margie Danchin.
    • Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital, Australia. Electronic address: raffaela.armiento@rch.org.au.
    • Vaccine. 2020 Jul 14; 38 (33): 5231-5240.

    Introduction'No Jab, No Play' and 'No Jab, No Pay' mandatory immunisation policies were introduced in the state of Victoria and Australia-wide, respectively, in January 2016. They restrict access to childcare/kindergarten and family assistance payments respectively, for under-vaccinated children. We aimed to describe the proportion of attendees to immunisation services of a tertiary hospital, the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne (RCH), who were motivated by the policies to discuss or catch-up vaccination. We explored the association between motivation by policies, vaccine hesitancy (VH) and intent to seek medical exemption, with vaccine-uptake.MethodsParents/Guardians and clinicians completed surveys October 2016-May 2017 from the nurse-led immunisation Drop in Centre (DIC) or physician-led Specialist Immunisation Clinic (SIC). Vaccine-uptake was measured using the Australian Immunisation Register (AIR) at baseline, 1 and 7 months post-attendance. The association between vaccine-uptake, motivation by policies and VH was explored by logistic regression.ResultsOf 607 children, 393 (65%) were from the DIC and 214 (35%) SIC. 74 (12%) parents were motivated by the policies to attend immunisation services and 19% were VH. Only 50% of VH parents planned to catch-up vaccination for enrolment to childcare/kindergarten. Seven months post-attendance there was no association between motivation by policies and full vaccination status (difference 10%, OR 0.42, CI 0.17-1.1, p 0.08). Fewer children were fully immunised at 7 months if their parents were VH (difference 18%; OR 0.24, CI 0.1-0.54, p < 0.001) or seeking medical exemption (difference 33%, OR 0.08, CI 0.01-0.6, p 0.015).ConclusionThe 'No Jab' policies motivated attendance to a tertiary immunisation service. However, children of vaccine hesitant parents and those seeking medical exemption to immunisation were less likely to be fully immunised after attendance, than at baseline. The 'No Jab' policies may not be changing vaccination behavior as intended for vaccine hesitant parents who are one of the key target groups, with further evaluation required.Crown Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.