• Isaac Josh Abecassis, MeyerR MichaelRMDepartments of1Neurological Surgery., Michael R Levitt, Jason P Sheehan, Ching-Jen Chen, Bradley A Gross, Ashley Lockerman, W Christopher Fox, Waleed Brinjikji, Giuseppe Lanzino, Robert M Starke, Stephanie H Chen, Adriaan R E Potgieser, van DijkJ Marc CJMC11Department of Neurosurgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands., Andrew Durnford, Diederik Bulters, Junichiro Satomi, Yoshiteru Tada, Amanda Kwasnicki, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, Ali Alaraj, Edgar A Samaniego, Minako Hayakawa, Colin P Derdeyn, Ethan Winkler, Adib Abla, LaiPui Man RosalindPMR17Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and., Rose Du, Ridhima Guniganti, Akash P Kansagra, Gregory J Zipfel, Louis J Kim, Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research, and CONDOR Collaborators .
• Departments of1Neurological Surgery.
• J. Neurosurg. 2022 Apr 1; 136 (4): 971980971-980.

ObjectiveThere is a reported elevated risk of cerebral aneurysms in patients with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs). However, the natural history, rate of spontaneous regression, and ideal treatment regimen are not well characterized. In this study, the authors aimed to describe the characteristics of patients with dAVFs and intracranial aneurysms and propose a classification system.MethodsThe Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research (CONDOR) database from 12 centers was retrospectively reviewed. Analysis was performed to compare dAVF patients with (dAVF+ cohort) and without (dAVF-only cohort) concomitant aneurysm. Aneurysms were categorized based on location as a dAVF flow-related aneurysm (FRA) or a dAVF non-flow-related aneurysm (NFRA), with further classification as extra- or intradural. Patients with traumatic pseudoaneurysms or aneurysms with associated arteriovenous malformations were excluded from the analysis. Patient demographics, dAVF anatomical information, aneurysm information, and follow-up data were collected.ResultsOf the 1077 patients, 1043 were eligible for inclusion, comprising 978 (93.8%) and 65 (6.2%) in the dAVF-only and dAVF+ cohorts, respectively. There were 96 aneurysms in the dAVF+ cohort; 10 patients (1%) harbored 12 FRAs, and 55 patients (5.3%) harbored 84 NFRAs. Dural AVF+ patients had higher rates of smoking (59.3% vs 35.2%, p < 0.001) and illicit drug use (5.8% vs 1.5%, p = 0.02). Sixteen dAVF+ patients (24.6%) presented with aneurysm rupture, which represented 16.7% of the total aneurysms. One patient (1.5%) had aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Patients with dAVF+ were more likely to have a dAVF located in nonconventional locations, less likely to have arterial supply to the dAVF from external carotid artery branches, and more likely to have supply from pial branches. Rates of cortical venous drainage and Borden type distributions were comparable between cohorts. A minority (12.5%) of aneurysms were FRAs. The majority of the aneurysms underwent treatment via either endovascular (36.5%) or microsurgical (15.6%) technique. A small proportion of aneurysms managed conservatively either with or without dAVF treatment spontaneously regressed (6.2%).ConclusionsPatients with dAVF have a similar risk of harboring a concomitant intracranial aneurysm unrelated to the dAVF (5.3%) compared with the general population (approximately 2%-5%) and a rare risk (0.9%) of harboring an FRA. Only 50% of FRAs are intradural. Dural AVF+ patients have differences in dAVF angioarchitecture. A subset of dAVF+ patients harbor FRAs that may regress after dAVF treatment.

18 keywords...

hide…