• M A Kuzu, C Köksoy, I T Kale, A Tanik, C Terzi, and A H Elhan.
• Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ankara, Turkey.
• Am. J. Surg. 1998 Oct 1; 176 (4): 348-51.

BackgroundRevascularization of ischemic bowel may induce further local tissue damage due to reperfusion injury. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of ischemia-reperfusion injury on the healing of intestinal anastomosis in experimental models.MethodsOne hundred and two male Wistar rats were divided into three groups: a control group (group I, n = 23); an ischemia group (group II, n = 32), in which only the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) was occluded for 30 minutes; and a profound ischemia group (group III, n = 47), in which SMA was occluded as well as collateral vessels for 30 minutes. The pulsations were seen to return to marginal vessels and the bowels began to appear pinker and healthier in all groups following the restoration of arterial flow. Then, all animals underwent a 3-cm ileal resection and primary anastomosis, 10 cm proximal to the ileocecal valve. Within each group, animals were anesthetized either on the third or seventh postoperative days. Abdominal wound healing, intraabdominal adhesions, anastomotic complications, anastomotic bursting pressure measurements, and bursting site were recorded.ResultsStatistically significant differences were detected in intraperitoneal adhesion scores in group II and III (P <0.001). Anastomotic dehiscence was found in 2 of 23 (9%) in group I, 5 of 32 (16%) in group II, and 16 of 47 (34%) in group III (P <0.001). On the third and seventh days, the median bursting pressures of the anastomosis were determined to be 42 mm Hg and 250 mm Hg in group I, 46 and 253 in group II, and finally 19 and 90 mm Hg in group III (P <0.01). The burst occurred at the anastomoses in all animals tested on the third postoperative day, none in group I, 4 (28%) in group II, and 8 (67%) in group III on the seventh postoperative day (P <0.005).ConclusionThe present study demonstrated that ischemia-reperfusion impairs anastomotic healing. Despite the fact that the intestines are well perfused and viable after revascularization, one must bear in mind that intestinal reperfusion may compromise anastomotic healing.

20 keywords...

hide…