• Dominik Horn, Rene Jonas, Michael Engel, Kolja Freier, Jürgen Hoffmann, and Christian Freudlsperger.
• Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
• J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Dec 1; 42 (8): 1551-6.

AbstractTailoring the most suitable reconstructive approach to each patient remains challenging especially in the head and neck region. To compare the applicability of the latissimus dorsi (LD) and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap, we retrospectively analyzed patients who had reconstruction of extensive and/or bulky composite tissue defects in the head and neck area. We performed 85 free tissue transfers (44 LD and 41 ALT flaps). LD mean flap surface was 115.8 cm(2). ALT mean flap surface was 67.0 cm(2). Pedicle length ranged from 8 to 16 cm in LD and 11-16 cm in ALT flaps. The survival rate was 93% in ALT and 91% in LD flaps. Donor site morbidity occurred in 5% (ALT) and 7% (LD). A Two-team-approach was possible in 24% of the LD group, whereas all ALT flaps were raised in a Two-team-approach. Both flaps present excellent opportunities for the reconstruction of extensive and/or bulky defects. They largely meet the requirements of an ideal soft tissue flap in terms of versatility, skin texture and tissue stock. Both flaps can be raised with a double skin paddle. The advantages and disadvantages of each flap have to be weighed up against each other and both flaps should be in the repertoire of every microvascular surgeon.© 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

41 keywords...

hide…