• Johnathon Harris, Christina A Fleming, Paul N Stassen, Daniel Mullen, Helen Mohan, James Foley, Anna Heeney, Emmeline Nugent, Karl Schmidt, and Ken Mealy.
• Department of General Surgery, Wexford General Hospital, Wexford, Ireland. johnathonharris@rcsi.ie.
• Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Aug 1; 191 (4): 1809-1813.

BackgroundAppendicitis is a common general surgical emergency. The role of removing a normal appendix is debated. However, this relies on accurate intra-operative diagnosis of a normal appendix by the operating surgeon. This study aimed to compare surgeon's intra-operative assessment to final histological result acute appendicitis in paediatric and adult patients.MethodsAll patients who underwent appendicectomy over a 14-year period in a general surgical department were identified using the prospective Lothian Surgical Audit system and pathology reports retrieved to identify final histological diagnosis. Open appendicectomy was selected to examine, as the routine practise at our institution is to remove a normal appendix at open appendicectomy.ResultsA total of 1035 open appendicectomies were performed for clinically suspected appendicitis. Sensitivity of intra-operative diagnosis of appendicitis with operating surgeon was high at 95.13% with no difference between trainee and consultant surgeon or between adult and paediatric cases. Specificity of intra-operative diagnosis was lower in the paediatric group (32.58%) than in the adult group (40.58%). Women had a higher rate of negative appendicectomy than men.ConclusionThe results of this study highlight some discordance between histological evidence of acute appendicitis and intra-operative impression. Therefore other clinical variables and not just macroscopic appearance alone should be used when deciding to perform appendicectomy.© 2021. The Author(s).

19 keywords...

hide…