• Maximiliane Jansky, Birgit Jaspers, Lukas Radbruch, and Friedemann Nauck.
• Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland. maximiliane.janksy@med.uni-goettingen.de.
• Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Jan 1; 60 (1): 89-98.

BackgroundThe need to regulate physician-assisted suicide (PAS) and organizations offering assisted suicide has been controversially debated in Germany. Before the German parliament voted on various drafts in November 2015, the German Association for Palliative Medicine surveyed its members on their attitudes and experiences regarding PAS.MethodItems for the survey were derived from the literature and consented in a focus group.Literature Search2005-2015 - PubMed: PAS [Title/Abstract] UND survey (all countries), grey literature. We invited 5152 members of the DGP to participate in the online/paper survey. Descriptive quantitative and content analytic qualitative analysis of data using SPSS and MaxQDA.ResultsWe obtained 1811 valid data sets (response rate 36.9%). 33.7% of the participants were male, 43.6% were female, and 0.4% identifed as other. Physicians accounted for 48.5% of the respondents, 17.8% nurses, other professions 14.3%, and about 20% of the data was missing socio-demographic information. More than 90% agreed that "wishes for PAS may be ambivalent" and "are rather a wish to end an unbearable situation". Of the 833 participating physicians, 56% refused participating in PAS and 74.2% had been asked to perform PAS. PAS was actually performed by 3%. Of all participating members, 56% approved of a legal ban of organizations offering assisted suicide. More than 60% of all professions agreed that PAS is not a part of palliative care.ConclusionThe respondents show a broad spectrum of attitudes, only partly supporting statements of relevant bodies, such as DGP. Because many are confronted with the issue, PAS is relevant to professionals in palliative care.

27 keywords...

hide…