• Resuscitation · Jun 1990

    Comparative Study

    Effect of high dose norepinephrine versus epinephrine on cerebral and myocardial blood flow during CPR.

    • J W Hoekstra, P Van Ligten, R Neumar, H A Werman, J Anderson, and C G Brown.
    • Division of Emergency Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1228.
    • Resuscitation. 1990 Jun 1; 19 (3): 227-40.

    AbstractSeveral animal studies have demonstrated an improvement in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and myocardial blood flow (MBF) after the administration of epinephrine (E) 0.20 mg/kg during closed chest CPR. The administration of norepinephrine (NE) in doses of 0.12 and 0.16 mg/kg demonstrated a trend toward improved CBF and MBF during CPR over that seen with E 0.20 mg/kg in the same animal model. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a higher dose of NE 0.20 mg/kg to E 0.20 mg/kg to determine if increasing doses of NE would demonstrate further improvement in CBF and MBF during CPR. Fourteen immature swine were anesthetized and instrumented for regional blood flow and hemodynamic measurements. After 10 min of ventricular fibrillation (VF), CPR was begun using a mechanical thumper. After 3 min of CPR, the animals received either E 0.20 mg/kg (n = 7) or NE 0.20 mg/kg (n = 7) through a right atrial catheter. CPR was continued for an additional 3.5 min and defibrillation was then attempted. CBF (ml/min/100 g), MBF (ml/min/100 g), myocardial oxygen delivery (MDo2; ml O2/min/100 g), myocardial oxygen consumption (MVo2; ml O2/min/100 g), and myocardial oxygen extraction ratios (ER, MVo2/MDo2) were measured during normal sinus rhythm (NSR), during CPR, and during CPR following drug administration. Following drug administration, CBF, MBF, MDo2 and MVo2 rose while ER fell in both E and NE groups. There were no significant differences between groups in CBF, ER, or intravascular pressures following drug administration (P greater than or equal to 0.07). The NE group demonstrated significantly higher MBF (118.9 +/- 73.1 vs. 62.2 +/- 45.3, P = 0.04), MVo2 (14.2 +/- 7.7 vs. 7.0 +/- 3.8, P = 0.05), and MDo2 (19.9 +/- 13.4 versus 9.4 +/- 6.3, P = 0.05) compared to the E group following drug administration While NE improved MBF and MDo2 over E during CPR, there was a trend toward lower resuscitation rates with NE (57.1% vs. 85.7% P = 0.56). Any benefit of higher MBF and MDo2 with NE 0.20 mg/kg appears to be offset by proportionately high MVo2 and a trend toward lower resuscitation rates in the NE 0.20 mg/kg animals.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…