• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Nov 2021

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Videolaryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy for Elective Airway Management in Paediatric Anaesthesia: A prospective randomised controlled trial.

    • Eva Klabusayová, Jozef Klučka, Martina Kosinová, Michaela Ťoukálková, Roman Štoudek, Milan Kratochvíl, Lukáš Mareček, Michal Svoboda, Petr Jabandžiev, Milan Urík, and Petr Štourač.
    • From the Department of Paediatric Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic (E.K., J.K., M.K., M.T., R.S., M.K., L.M., P.S.), Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Czech Republic (E.K., J.K., M.K., M.T., R.S., M.K., L.M., P.J., M.U., P.S.), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic (M.S.), Department of Paediatric, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic (P.J.) and Department of Paediatric ENT, University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic (M.U.).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Nov 1; 38 (11): 1187-1193.

    BackgroundThe indirect visualisation of the glottic area with a videolaryngoscope could improve intubation conditions which may possibly lead to a higher success rate of the first intubation attempt.ObjectiveComparison of videolaryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for elective airway management in paediatric patients.DesignProspective randomised controlled trial.SettingsOperating room.Participants535 paediatric patients undergoing elective anaesthesia with tracheal intubation. 501 patients were included in the final analysis.InterventionsPatients were randomly allocated to the videolaryngoscopy group (n  = 265) and to the direct laryngoscopy group (n  = 269) for the primary airway management.Main Outcome MeasuresThe first attempt intubation success rate was assessed as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes were defined as: the time to successful intubation (time to the first EtCO2 wave), the overall intubation success rate, the number of intubation attempts, the incidence of complications, and the impact of the length of the operator's clinical practice.ResultsThe study was terminated after the planned interim analysis for futility. There were no significant demographic differences between the two groups. The first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group; 86.8% (n  = 211) vs. 92.6% (n  = 239), P = 0.046. The mean time to the first EtCO2 wave was longer in the videolaryngoscopy group at 39.0 s ± 36.7 compared to the direct laryngoscopy group, 23.6 s ± 24.7 (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the overall intubation success rate, in the incidence of complications nor significant difference based on the length of the clinical practice of the operator.ConclusionsThe first attempt intubation success rate was lower in the videolaryngoscopy group in comparison to the direct laryngoscopy group. The time needed for successful intubation with videolaryngoscopy was longer compared with direct laryngoscopy.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03747250.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…