• Ann Am Thorac Soc · Feb 2014

    Accuracy of early prediction of duration of mechanical ventilation by intensivists.

    • Juan B Figueroa-Casas, Sean M Connery, Ricardo Montoya, Alok K Dwivedi, and Soyoung Lee.
    • 1 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
    • Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Feb 1;11(2):182-5.

    RationalePredictions of duration of mechanical ventilation are frequently made by intensivists and influence clinical decisions.ObjectivesWe aimed to measure the accuracy of these clinical early predictions.MethodsOne hundred fifty-five patients within 48 hours of initiation of mechanical ventilation on a general intensive care unit had clinical data prospectively collected and were followed to determine actual duration of mechanical ventilation. Intensivists, after evaluating patients in the first 2 consecutive days, predicted each duration of mechanical ventilation by selecting between less than 3, 4 to 7, 8 to 14, or more than 14 days. Accuracy of predictions was evaluated by comparisons between predicted and actual durations.Measurements And Main ResultsRaw agreement (95% confidence interval) between predicted and actual durations, classified into the four categories, was 37% (29-45%). Predictions of duration of more than 7 and more than 14 days showed raw agreements of 59% (51-66%) and 83% (76-88%); sensitivities of 40% (28-54%) and 29% (13-51%); specificities of 71% (61-80%) and 93% (87-97%); positive predictive values of 48% (34-63%) and 44% (20-70%); and negative predictive values of 64% (54-73%) and 87% (81-92%), respectively.ConclusionsThe accuracy of intensivists' early clinical predictions of duration of mechanical ventilation is limited, particularly for identifying patients who will require prolonged mechanical ventilation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.