• Barrie J Huberman, Debjani Mukherjee, Ezra Gabbay, Samantha F Knowlton, GreenDouglas S TDSTClinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology at Weill Cornell Medical College; and an Attending Anesthesiologist in the Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Management at Hospital for Special Surgery in New York, New , Nekee Pandya, Nicole Meredith, Joan M Walker, Zachary E Shapiro, Jennifer E Hersh, Mary F Chisholm, Seth A Waldman, C Ronald MacKenzie, Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, and Joseph J Fins.
• Interim Assistant Professor of Medical Ethics in Clinical Medicine and Clinical Director of the Division of Medical Ethics at Weill Cornell Medical College; and Clinical Director of Medical Ethics and Senior Clinical Ethicist at New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, New York USA. bjh4001@med.cornell.edu.
• J Clin Ethics. 2020 Jan 1; 31 (3): 219-227.

AbstractWhen the COVID-19 surge hit New York City hospitals, the Division of Medical Ethics at Weill Cornell Medical College, and our affiliated ethics consultation services, faced waves of ethical issues sweeping forward with intensity and urgency. In this article, we describe our experience over an eight-week period (16 March through 10 May 2020), and describe three types of services: clinical ethics consultation (CEC); service practice communications/interventions (SPCI); and organizational ethics advisement (OEA). We tell this narrative through the prism of time, describing the evolution of ethical issues and trends as the pandemic unfolded. We delineate three phases: anticipation and preparation, crisis management, and reflection and adjustment. The first phase focused predominantly on ways to address impending resource shortages and to plan for remote ethics consultation, and CECs focused on code status discussions with surrogates. The second phase was characterized by the dramatic convergence of a rapid increase in the number of critically ill patients, a growing scarcity of resources, and the reassignment/redeployment of staff outside their specialty areas. The third phase was characterized by the recognition that while the worst of the crisis was waning, its medium- and long-term consequences continued to pose immense challenges. We note that there were times during the crisis that serving in the role of clinical ethics consultant created a sense of dis-ease as novel as the coronavirus itself. In retrospect we learned that our activities far exceeded the familiar terrain of clinical ethics consultation and extended into other spheres of organizational life in novel ways that were unanticipated before this pandemic. To that end, we defined and categorized a middle level of ethics consultation, which we have termed service practice communication intervention (SPCI). This is an underappreciated dimension of the work that ethics consult services are capable of in times of crisis. We believe that the pandemic has revealed the many enduring ways that ethics consultation services can more robustly contribute to the ethical life of their institutions moving forward.Copyright 2020 The Journal of Clinical Ethics. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…