• Dimitrios Balafoutas, Ralf Joukhadar, Matthias Kiesel, Sebastian Häusler, Sanja Loeb, Achim Woeckel, and Daniel Herr.
• University Hospital of Würzburg, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Würzburg, Germany.
• JSLS. 2019 Apr 1; 23 (2).

Background And ObjectivesSkills-lab training is crucial for the development of advanced laparoscopic skills. In this study, we examined whether a systematic deconstructive and comprehensive tutoring approach improves training results in laparoscopic suturing and intracorporeal knot tying.MethodsSixteen residents in obstetrics and gynecology participating in structured skills-lab laparoscopy training were randomized in 2 equal-sized groups receiving 1-on-1 tutoring either in the traditional method or according to the Peyton's 4-step approach, involving an additional training step, with the trainees instructing the tutor to perform the exercises. A validated assessment tool (revised Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills) and the number of completed square knots per training session and the mean time per knot were used to assess the efficacy of training in both groups.ResultsTrainees in Peyton's group achieved significantly higher revised Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills scores (28.6 vs 23.9 points; P = .05) and were able to improve their scores during autonomous training repetitions, in contrast to the trainees not in Peyton's group (difference +4.75 vs -4.29 points, P = .02). Additionally, they seemed to be able to perform a greater number of successful knots during the exercise and to complete each knot quicker with the later observations failing to reach the threshold of statistical significance.ConclusionPeyton's 4-step approach seemed to be superior for teaching laparoscopic skills to obstetrics and gynecology residents in the skills-lab setting and can be therefore proposed for training curricula.

16 keywords...

hide…