• Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. · Dec 2016

    Early-onset preeclampsia appears to discourage subsequent pregnancy but the risks may be overestimated.

    • Sean K Seeho, Charles S Algert, Christine L Roberts, and Jane B Ford.
    • Clinical and Population Perinatal Health, Kolling Institute, Northern Sydney Local Heath District, St. Leonards, and Sydney Medical School Northern, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: sean.seeho@sydney.edu.au.
    • Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016 Dec 1; 215 (6): 785.e1-785.e8.

    BackgroundEarly-onset preeclampsia is associated with adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. For women who consider another pregnancy after one complicated by early-onset preeclampsia, the likelihood of recurrence and the subsequent pregnancy outcome for themselves and their babies are pertinent considerations.ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to determine the subsequent pregnancy rate after a nulliparous pregnancy that was complicated by early-onset preeclampsia and among those who have a subsequent pregnancy, the risk of recurrence by gestational week, and adverse pregnancy outcomes.Study DesignThis was a population-based record linkage cohort study. The study population included nulliparous women with a singleton pregnancy and early-onset preeclampsia (<34 weeks gestation) who gave birth in New South Wales Australia from 2001-2010 (the index birth), with follow-up data for a subsequent birth through 2012. Early-onset in the index birth was further categorized as <28 vs 28-33 weeks gestation. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes that were assessed included the pregnancy rate, preeclampsia recurrence, and maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality rates. The risk of preeclampsia necessitating delivery at each gestational week for women who were at risk was plotted, and the net gain or loss of gestational age when comparing the index with the subsequent pregnancy was calculated.ResultsAmong 361,031 nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies, 1473 (0.4%) had early-onset preeclampsia. Women with early-onset preeclampsia in their first pregnancy had a lower subsequent pregnancy rate (59.7%) than women without preeclampsia (67.7%). Of the 758 women with a subsequent singleton birth, 256 (33.8%) experienced preeclampsia in the next pregnancy; 57 women (7.5%) with recurrent early-onset preeclampsia were included. Cumulative rates of preeclampsia in the subsequent pregnancy were higher at every gestation from 23 weeks gestation when the index birth was <28 weeks compared with 28-33 weeks gestation. The cumulative rate and gestation-specific risk of recurrent preeclampsia rose most steeply at 32-38 weeks gestation. Most women (94.6%) progressed to a later gestational age in their subsequent pregnancy. The median overall increase in gestational age at delivery was 6 weeks (interquartile range, 4-8); among women with recurrent preeclampsia, the median increase was 5 weeks (interquartile range, 2-7). Women with index birth <28 weeks gestation compared with 28-33 weeks gestation were more likely to deliver preterm (38.8% vs 28.7%; relative risk, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.75) and have a perinatal death (4.3% vs 1.2%; relative risk, 3.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-10.39) at the subsequent birth, but live born infants had similar rates of severe morbidity (17.1% vs 15.0%; relative risk, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-1.79).ConclusionWomen with early-onset preeclampsia in a first pregnancy appear less likely than women without preeclampsia to have a subsequent pregnancy. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in the subsequent pregnancy are generally better than in the first; most women will not have recurrent preeclampsia, and those who do usually will give birth at a greater gestational age compared with their index birth.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…