• Spine J · Jul 2018

    The in vivo response to a novel Ti coating compared with polyether ether ketone: evaluation of the periphery and inner surfaces of an implant.

    • William Robert Walsh, Matthew H Pelletier, Chris Christou, Jiawei He, Frank Vizesi, and Scott D Boden.
    • Surgical & Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School - The University of New South Wales, Avoca St, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia. Electronic address: w.walsh@unsw.edu.au.
    • Spine J. 2018 Jul 1; 18 (7): 1231-1240.

    Background ContextIncreasing bone ongrowth and ingrowth of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) interbody fusion devices has the potential to improve clinical outcomes.PurposeThis study evaluated the in vivo response of promoting new bone growth and bone apposition with NanoMetalene (NM) compared with PEEK alone in a cancellous implantation site with an empty aperture.Study DesignThis is a randomized control animal study.MethodsImplants and funding for this study were provided by SeaSpine (60,000 USD). Cylindrical dowels with two apertures were prepared as PEEK with a sub-micron layer of the titanium (NM). The titanium coating was applied over the entire implant (Group 1) or just the apertures (Group 2). Polyether ether ketone implants with no coating served as controls (Group 3). Implants were placed in the cancellous bone of the distal femur or proximal tibia with no graft material placed in the apertures in eight adult sheep. Bone ongrowth to the surface of the implant and ingrowth into the apertures was assessed at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery with micro-computed tomography (CT) and undecalcified histology.ResultsThe apertures in the implants were notably empty in the PEEK group at 4 and 8 weeks. In contrast, new bone formation into the apertures was found in samples coated with NM even though no graft material was placed into the defect. The bone growing into the aperture tracked along the titanium layer. Apertures with the titanium coating demonstrated significantly more bone by micro-CT qualitative grading compared with PEEK with average bone coverage scores of Group 1 (NM) 1.62±0.89, Group 2 (NM apertures only) 1.62±0.77, and Group 3 (PEEK) 0.43±0.51, respectively, at 4 weeks (p<.01) and Group 1 (NM) 1.79±1.19, Group 2 (NM apertures only) 1.98±1.18, and Group 3 (PEEK) 0.69±0.87, respectively, at 8 weeks (p<.05). The amount of bone in the apertures (ingrowth) quantified using the volumetric data from the micro-CT supported an overall increase in bone volume inside the apertures with the titanium coating compared with PEEK. Histology showed newly formed woven bone tracked along the surface of the titanium in the apertures. The PEEK interface presented the typical nonreactive fibrous tissue inside the apertures at 4 weeks and some focal contact with bone on the outside at 4 weeks and 8 weeks.ConclusionsMicro-CT and histology demonstrated bone ongrowth to the surfaces coated with NM where the newly formed bone tracked along the thin titanium-coated surfaces. Polyether ether ketone surfaces presented the nonreactive fibrous tissue at the interface as previously reported in preclinical scenarios.Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…