-
- Masaki Iguchi, Tsuneari Takahashi, Tomohiro Matsumura, Ryusuke Ae, Shuhei Hiyama, Mitsuharu Nakashima, and Katsushi Takeshita.
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, 3311-1 Yakushiji, Shimotsuke, 329-0498, Japan. Electronic address: m08006mi@jichi.ac.jp.
- Injury. 2021 Nov 1; 52 (11): 3363-3368.
IntroductionThe AO/OTA classification for diagnosing femoral trochanteric fractures (31A fractures) was revised in 2018. No studies have investigated whether the addition of CT to radiographic diagnosis improves the inter-rater reliability of classifying 31A fractures with the current AO/OTA criteria. The study aimed to test the hypothesis that the addition of three-dimensional CT (3D-CT) to radiographic diagnosis would improve diagnostic reliability.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted to assess the diagnostic reliability of classification of 31A fractures with current AO/OTA criteria. Radiographs and 3D-CT images from 89 cases were assessed. Major fracture types (A1, A2, and A3) and subgroups were diagnosed by nine orthopedic surgeons who were classified into three groups (high-, intermediate-, and low-experience) according to their clinical experience. Anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs were provided to diagnose fracture type (first assessment). After a 6-week interval, radiographs and 3D-CT images of all cases were evaluated by each rater (second assessment). Fleiss's Kappa was used to determine inter-rater reliability.ResultsIn the first assessment, the Kappa value indicated fair inter-rater reliability in all groups (high-experience group: κ = 0.296, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.239-0.352; intermediate-experience group: κ = 0.367, 95% CI 0.305-0.428; low-experience group: κ = 0.304, 95% CI 0.246-0.362). With the addition of 3D-CT (second assessment), reliability improved from fair to moderate in the high- and intermediate-experience groups (κ = 0.483, 95% CI 0.428-0.539 and κ = 0.409, 95% CI 0.352-0.466, respectively). By contrast, reliability remained fair in the low-experience group (κ = 0.322, 95% CI 0.322-0.431). The inter-rater reliability of diagnosing subgroup fracture types improved for A2.3 and A3.1 in all three groups and for A3.2 and A3.3 in the intermediate- and low-experience groups.ConclusionThe current AO/OTA classification revised in 2018 provided fair reliability in diagnosing femoral trochanteric fractures in all three surgeon groups. The addition of 3D-CT to radiographic image evaluation improved reliability in high- and middle-expertise groups. The addition of 3D-CT to radiographic evaluation often improved the diagnostic reliability for unstable fractures, although there was some variation among fracture subgroups.Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.