• Zhijun Zhou, Biyun Teng, Yu Zhao, and Zhe Wang.
• Department of Vascular Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Oct 1; 100 (39): e27306e27306.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the hemodynamic parameters of symptomatic and asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) to explore the risk factors for AAA rupture.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 26 patients with symptomatic small AAAs and 60 patients with asymptomatic small AAAs. Computational fluid dynamics methods were used to compare hemodynamic characteristics between the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups and to evaluate risk factors for the occurrence of symptomatic AAAs.ResultsThe maximum diameters in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were 49.7 ± 4.94 mm and 48.4 ± 4.55 mm, respectively. Wall shear stress values at turbulent flow regions in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were 0.0098 ± 0.0084 Pa versus 0.0174 ± 0.0068 Pa, respectively. Shear stress values at the site with maximal blood flow impact force in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were 1.13 ± 0.466 Pa and 2.04 ± 0.42 Pa, respectively. The areas of the intra-luminal thrombus in the section with the maximum diameter in the symptomatic and asymptomatic groups were 952.19 ± 413.53 mm2 versus 646.63 ± 296.88 mm2, respectively.ConclusionThe wall shear stress in the symptomatic group was lower than that in the asymptomatic group.Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

20 keywords...

hide…