-
- Christine P Kowalski, Deanna B McQuillan, Neetu Chawla, Courtney Lyles, Andrea Altschuler, Connie S Uratsu, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Michele Heisler, and Richard W Grant.
- From the Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI (CPK, MH); Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, CO (DBM, EAB); Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente-Northern California, Oakland, CA (NC, AA, CSU, RWG); Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco (CL); Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (EAB); Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (MH).
- J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jan 1; 31 (1): 29-37.
BackgroundChoosing which issues to discuss in the limited time available during primary care visits is an important task for complex patients with chronic conditions.Design, Setting, And ParticipantsWe conducted sequential interviews with complex patients (n = 40) and their primary care physicians (n = 17) from 3 different health systems to investigate how patients and physicians prepare for visits, how visit agendas are determined, and how discussion priorities are established during time-limited visits.Key ResultsVisit flow and alignment were enhanced when both patients and physicians were effectively prepared before the visit, when the patient brought up highest-priority items first, the physician and patient worked together at the beginning of the visit to establish the visit agenda, and other team members contributed to agenda setting. A range of factors were identified that undermined the ability of patient and physicians to establish an efficient working agenda: the most prominent were time pressure and short visit lengths, but also included differing visit expectations, patient hesitancy to bring up embarrassing concerns, electronic medical record/documentation requirements, differences balancing current symptoms versus future medical risk, nonactionable items, differing philosophies about medications and lifestyle interventions, and difficulty by patients in prioritizing their top concerns.ConclusionsPrimary care patients and their physicians adopt a range of different strategies to address the time constraints during visits. The primary factor that supported well-aligned visits was the ability for patients and physicians to proactively negotiate the visit agenda at the beginning of the visit. Efforts to optimize care within time-constrained systems should focus on helping patients more effectively prepare for visits. Physicians should ask for the patient's agenda early, explain visit parameters, establish a reasonable number of concerns that can be discussed, and collaborate on a plan to deal with concerns that cannot be addressed during the visit.© Copyright 2018 by the American Board of Family Medicine.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.