• Jacob M Marszalek, Carolyn Barber, Julie Kohlhart, and Cooper B Holmes.
• Division of Counseling and Educational Psychology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 64110, USA. marszalekj@umkc.edu
• Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Apr 1;112(2):331-48.

AbstractThe American Psychological Association (APA) Task Force on Statistical Inference was formed in 1996 in response to a growing body of research demonstrating methodological issues that threatened the credibility of psychological research, and made recommendations to address them. One issue was the small, even dramatically inadequate, size of samples used in studies published by leading journals. The present study assessed the progress made since the Task Force's final report in 1999. Sample sizes reported in four leading APA journals in 1955, 1977, 1995, and 2006 were compared using nonparametric statistics, while data from the last two waves were fit to a hierarchical generalized linear growth model for more in-depth analysis. Overall, results indicate that the recommendations for increasing sample sizes have not been integrated in core psychological research, although results slightly vary by field. This and other implications are discussed in the context of current methodological critique and practice.

21 keywords...

hide…