• Disabil Rehabil · Mar 2002

    Inter-observer reliability of clinical outcome measures in a lower limb amputee population.

    • M D Gardiner, S Faux, and L E Jones.
    • Rehabilitation Medicine, Calvary Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia. gardinerma@sesahs.nsw.gov.au
    • Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Mar 10; 24 (4): 219-25.

    PurposeIn an attempt to find a more clinically useful functional outcome measure specifically tailored for lower limb amputees undergoing inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation, a 6-month prospective assessment of inter-rater reliability for Harold Wood-Stanmore Mobility Scale Data, including two handicap scales, was undertaken. An analysis of the data is presented in this paper.MethodsAn inter-rater reliability study was undertaken using four observers to complete admission and discharge scores for the three disability/handicap scales on 14 consecutive patients over 6 months.ResultsThe disability mobility scale demonstrated perfect observer agreement on admission and at discharge the inter-rater reliability for this measure was high (0.83). By contrast, reliability between observers for admission scores on the handicap mobility scale was poor at 0.49 but reasonably high on discharge (0.83). On admission, inter-rater reliability for handicap physical independence was very low (0.15). At discharge, reliability improved to 0.69 being more consistent with results achieved for the other axes.ConclusionsThis study confirms the good inter-rater reliability demonstrated previously in the literature but reveals poor inter-rater reliability for the two handicap scales. The latter will require modification before they can be used with confidence in conjunction with the disability scale.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…