• Damien Contandriopoulos, Kelli Stajduhar, Tanya Sanders, Annie Carrier, Ami Bitschy, and Laura Funk.
• School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, British-Columbia, Canada.
• J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Aug 1; 28 (4): 680-689.

Rationale, Aims And ObjectivesThere is a large body of literature from all over the world that describes, analyzes, or evaluates home care models and interventions. The present article aims to identify the practical lessons that can be gained from a systematic examination of that literature.MethodWe conducted a three-step sequential search process from which 113 documents were selected. That corpus was then narratively analysed according to a realist review approach.ResultsA first level of observation is that there are multiple blind spots in the existing literature on home care. The definition and delimitation of what constitutes home care services is generally under-discussed. In the same way, the composition of the basket of care provided and its fit with the need of recipients is under-addressed. Finally, the literature relies heavily on RCTs whose practical contribution to decisions or policy is disputable. At a second level, our analysis suggests that three mechanisms (system integration, case management and relational continuity) are core characteristics of home care models' effectiveness.ConclusionWe conclude by providing advice for supporting the design and implementation of stronger home care delivery systems. Our analysis suggests that doing so implies a series of sequential steps: identify what system-level goals the model should achieve and which populations it should serve; identify what type of services are likely to achieve those goals in order to establish a basket of services; and finally, identify the best ways and specific means to effectively and efficiently provide those services. Those same steps can also support ex-post evaluations of existing home care systems.© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

8 keywords...

hide…