• J Infect Public Health · Nov 2019

    Oral treatment options for patients with urinary tract infections caused by extended spectrum βeta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae.

    • Nadeem Sajjad Raja.
    • Department of Clinical Micobiology, East Sussex Healthcare Trust, Hastings, England, UK. Electronic address: nadeem.raja@nhs.net.
    • J Infect Public Health. 2019 Nov 1; 12 (6): 843-846.

    IntroductionFrequent use of different antibiotics to treat urinary tract infections (UTIs) exerts a variety of selective pressure on pathogens which ultimately lead to the antimicrobial resistance. Extended Spectrum βeta-Lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriacae causing UTIs, which are usually multidrug resistant organisms, pose a great therapeutic treatment challenge. Rediscovery of forgotten antibiotics such as pivmecillinam, fosfomycin, and nitrofurantoin may be helpful in this situation until the discovery of new agents. The main aim of present study was to determine the prevalence of ESBL producing Enterobacteriacae causing UTIs and their sensitivity profile to determine alternate effective oral treatment options.MethodsThis retrospective study was conducted to determine the prevalence of ESBL producing Enterobacteriacae from urine samples and their sensitivity profile (pivmecillinam, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin) from September 2015 to September 2017.ResultsA total of 986 organisms were isolated from the urine samples of 680 patients. Approximately 77% isolates were obtained from female patients (526). Of 986 organisms, Escherichia coli was the most common isolated organism (889, 90%); followed by Klebsiella species (71, 7%) and other Enterobacteriacae (26, 3%). Of 889 E. coli, approximately 98%, 96%, and 93% were found to be sensitive to fosfomycin, pivmecillinam and nitrofurantoin respectively. On the other hand pivmecillinam was most effective against Klebsiella species (83%, 59); followed by fosfomycin (62%, 44) and nitrofurantoin (42%, 30). Of 26 other Enterobacteriacae, 23 (88%), and 22 (85%) were sensitive to pivmecillinam and fosfomycin while lower sensitivity rate (15%, 4) was noted against nitrofurantoin. More than 95% of all ESBL producing Enterobacteriacae were sensitive to pivmecillinam, fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin. Trimethoprim and ciprofloxacin were least effective.ConclusionThe emergence of multidrug resistant ESBL producing Enterobacteriacae restricts significantly the therapeutic options. This study shows higher sensitivity rates to pivmecillinam, fosfomycin and nitrofurantoin. We recommend their use to treat uncomplicated UTIs due to ESBL producing Enterobacteriacae.Copyright © 2019 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…