• Eur J Anaesthesiol · Nov 2021

    Meta Analysis

    For nasotracheal intubation, which nostril results in less epistaxis: right or left?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • Ying-Lun Tan, Zhu-Hao Wu, Bao-Jian Zhao, Yan-Hong Ni, and Ying-Chun Dong.
    • From the Medical School of Nantong University, Nantong (YLT), Department of Oral Anesthesiology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital (ZHW, BJZ, YCD) and Central Laboratory, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China (YHN).
    • Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Nov 1; 38 (11): 118011861180-1186.

    BackgroundNasotracheal intubation is usually required in patients undergoing oromaxillofacial, otolaryngological or plastic surgery to prevent the airway encroaching into the operating field. Epistaxis is the most common complication, but which nostril is associated with a lower incidence and severity of epistaxis is still unclear.ObjectiveWhen both nostrils are patent, to determine the preferred nostril for nasotracheal intubation under general anaesthesia.DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was the incidence of epistaxis and the secondary outcomes included the incidence of severe epistaxis, the time required to pass the tube through the nasal passage and total intubation time.Data SourcesPubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to 1 March 2020.Eligibility CriteriaThe only studies included were RCTs comparing epistaxis related to nasotracheal intubation via right or left nostril, in adult surgery patients undergoing general anaesthesia.ResultsTen RCTs with 1658 patients were included. Compared with the left nostril, intubation via the right nostril was associated with a significantly lower incidence of epistaxis: risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were 0.78 (0.62 to 0.99), P = 0.04: a lower incidence of severe epistaxis (five studies, n=923), RR 0.40 (0.22 to 0.75), P = 0.004: and a shorter intubation time (three studies, n=345), mean difference -7.28 (-14.40 to -0.16) seconds, P = 0.05. In two studies (n=310), no significant difference between the right and left nostril was observed in the time to pass the tube through the nasal passages, mean difference -0.59 (-1.95 to 0.77) s, P = 0.40.ConclusionOn the basis of the current available evidence, when both nostrils are patent, the right nostril is more appropriate for nasotracheal intubation, with a lower incidence and severity of epistaxis and faster intubation time.Trial RegistrationThe study protocol has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020169949).Copyright © 2021 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.