• Nathaniel C Thompson, Justin Stinnett-Donnelly, Nicole Habel, Bryce Benson, Jason H T Bates, Burton E Sobel, and Peter S Spector.
• Department of Medicine, Colchester Research Facility, University of Vermont College of Medicine, 208 South Park Drive, Colchester, VT, 05446, USA, Nathaniel.Thompson@vtmednet.org.
• J Clin Monit Comput. 2014 Apr 1;28(2):157-63.

AbstractTo improve spatial resolution in recordings of intra-cardiac electrograms we characterized the utility of a novel configuration of two recording electrodes arranged perpendicularly to the endocardial surface. We hypothesized that this configuration denoted as orthogonal close unipolar (OCU) would combine advantages of conventional unipolar and contact bipolar (CBP) configurations. Electrical excitation was simulated in a computational model as arising from dipole current or from multi-wavelet reentry sources. Recordings were calculated for electrode tips 1 mm above the plane of the heart. Analogous recordings were obtained from swine hearts. Electrograms recorded with CBP showed strong dependence on orientation of the electrode pair with respect to the direction of spread of tissue excitation. By contrast, OCU recordings exhibited no directional dependence. OCU was significantly superior to CBP with respect to avoidance of far-field confounding of local tissue activity; the average far-field/near-field ratios for CBP and OCU were 0.09 and 0.05, respectively, for the simulated dipole current sources. In the swine hearts the ratios of ventricular to atrial signals for CBP and OCU were 0.15 ± 0.07 and 0.08 ± 0.09, respectively (p < 0.001). The difference between the actual dominant frequency in the tissue and that recorded by the electrodes was 0.44 ± 0.33 Hz for OCU, 0.58 ± 0.40 Hz for unipolar, and 0.62 ± 0.46 Hz for CBP. OCU confers improved spatial resolution compared with both unipolar and CBP electrode configurations. Unlike the case with CBP, OCU recordings are independent of excitation wave-front direction.

20 keywords...

hide…