• Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Aug 2004

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    Impact of pleural effusion pH on the efficacy of thoracoscopic mechanical pleurodesis in patients with breast carcinoma.

    • A Crnjac, M Sok, and M Kamenik.
    • Department of Thoracic Surgery, Teaching Hospital Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia. crnjac@sb-mb.si
    • Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Aug 1;26(2):432-6.

    ObjectiveA prospective randomised study was conducted to compare the efficacy of treating malignant pleural effusions (MPE) in patients with breast carcinoma by thoracoscopic mechanical pleurodesis (TMP) as a new palliative treatment and talc pleurodesis (TP) at various pleural fluid pH levels and to determine whether at low pH values, when the success of TP is reduced, TMP is more successful.Methods87 female patients with breast carcinoma and a resulting MPE resistant to systemic therapy were divided into two groups: TMP and TP groups. In the TMP group 24 patients with pH levels above 7.3 and 21 patients with pH levels below 7.3 underwent thoracoscopic parietal and visceral pleural abrasion utilising general anaesthesia. In the TP group, 22 patients with pH levels above 7.3 and 20 patients with pH levels below 7.3 were administered 5 g of sterile talc, dissolved in 100 ml of physiological solution, via a chest tube, utilising local anaesthesia. Postoperative follow-up was performed to determine a possible recurrence of MPE with periodic radiographs, the duration of chest tube drainage and hospitalisation, occurrence of complications, and perioperative mortality. The following was used for statistical analysis: t-test for odd samples, chi2 test, logistic regression, and multiple linear regression.ResultsTMP and TP were equally successful (92 and 91%) in patients with pH levels above 7.3. Differences occurred in patients with pH below 7.3 (81 and 55%) (P = 0.07). The lowest pH value at which TMP proved successful was 7.06, while for TP this value was 7.25. In TMP group the average duration of chest tube drainage amounted to 3.8 days and hospitalisation to 5.5 days, while in TP group it was 5.6 and 7.5 days, respectively. Differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). 16% of easily treatable complications and no case of perioperative mortality were identified in TMP group, while 26% of complications and four cases of perioperative mortality were noted in TP group.ConclusionsTMP is a safe palliative treatment for MPE in breast carcinoma, with a minimal number of complications and a short hospital stay; it is more successful than TP in patients with pH of MPE below 7.3.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.