-
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open · Jul 2020
Deep-learning artificial intelligence analysis of clinical variables predicts mortality in COVID-19 patients.
- Jocelyn S Zhu, Peilin Ge, Chunguo Jiang, Yong Zhang, Xiaoran Li, Zirun Zhao, Liming Zhang, and Tim Q Duong.
- Departments of Radiology, Renaissance School of Medicine Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA.
- J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Jul 16.
Study ObjectiveThe large number of clinical variables associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection makes it challenging for frontline physicians to effectively triage COVID-19 patients during the pandemic. This study aimed to develop an efficient deep-learning artificial intelligence algorithm to identify top clinical variable predictors and derive a risk stratification score system to help clinicians triage COVID-19 patients.MethodsThis retrospective study consisted of 181 hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection from January 29, 2020 to March 21, 2020 from a major hospital in Wuhan, China. The primary outcome was mortality. Demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, symptoms, and laboratory tests were collected at initial presentation, totaling 78 clinical variables. A deep-learning algorithm and a risk stratification score system were developed to predict mortality. Data were split into 85% training and 15% testing. Prediction performance were compared with those using COVID-19 severity score, CURB-65 score and pneumonia severity index (PSI).ResultsOf the 181 COVID-19 patients, 39 expired and 142 survived. Five top predictors of mortality were D-dimer, O2 Index, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein, and lactate dehydrogenase. The top 5 predictors and the resultant risk score yielded, respectively, an area under curve (AUC) of 0.968 ([95% CI:0.87-1.0]) and 0.954 ([95% CI:0.80-0.99]) for the testing dataset. Our models outperformed COVID-19 severity score (AUC = 0.756), CURB-65 score (AUC = 0.671), and PSI (AUC = 0.838). The mortality rates for our risk stratification scores (0-5) were 0, 0, 6.7, 18.2, 67.7, and 83.3%, respectively.Conclusions And RelevanceDeep-learning prediction model and the resultant risk stratification score may prove useful in clinical decision-making under time-sensitive and resource-constrained environment.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.