-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Repeat hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective multicentre study.
- J-H Zhong, B-C Xing, W-G Zhang, A W-H Chan, ChongC C NCCN0000-0002-8425-8767Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China., M Serenari, N Peng, T Huang, S-D Lu, Z-Y Liang, R-R Huo, Y-Y Wang, M Cescon, T-Q Liu, L Li, F-X Wu, L Ma, M Ravaioli, J Neri, A Cucchetti, P J Johnson, L-Q Li, and B-D Xiang.
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Department, Guangxi Liver Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Engineering and Technology Research Centre, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China.
- Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 17; 109 (1): 71-78.
BackgroundThe therapeutic value of repeat hepatic resection (rHR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of rHR or RFA.MethodsThis was a retrospective multicentre study of patients with recurrent HCC within the Milan criteria who underwent rHR or RFA at nine university hospitals in China and Italy between January 2003 and January 2018. Survival after rHR or RFA was examined in unadjusted analyses and after propensity score matching (1 : 1).ResultsOf 847 patients included, 307 and 540 underwent rHR and RFA respectively. Median overall survival was 73.5 and 67.0 months after rHR and RFA respectively (hazard ratio 1.01 (95 per cent c.i. 0.81 to 1.26)). Median recurrence-free survival was longer after rHR versus RFA (23.6 versus 15.2 months; hazard ratio 0.76 (95 per cent c.i. 0.65 to 0.89)). These results were confirmed after propensity score matching. RFA was associated with lower morbidity of grade 3 and above (0.6 versus 6.2 per cent; P < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (8.0 versus 3.0 days, P < 0.001) than rHR.ConclusionrHR was associated with longer recurrence-free survival but not overall survival compared with RFA.© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.