• Shireen R Chacko, Ananth P Abraham, Hesarghatta Shyamasunder Asha, Nitin Kapoor, Simon Rajaratnam, and Ari G Chacko.
• Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, 632004, India.
• Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Oct 1; 162 (10): 2381-2388.

BackgroundThere is no consensus regarding the use of perioperative steroids for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. We audited the effectiveness and safety of our selective perioperative steroid supplementation protocol in patients with pituitary adenomas.MethodsTwo hundred ninety-seven patients underwent 306 endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries for removal of their pituitary tumors. Steroids were given to those with an impaired hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, age ≥ 60 years, clinical apoplexy, hyponatremia, or if the pituitary gland was not preserved at surgery. We excluded 111 patients in whom the integrity of the HPA axis could not be determined. We compared the incidence of early postoperative adrenal insufficiency and complications in 135 patients with intact HPA axes who underwent surgery without steroids (group A) with 60 patients who had compromised preoperative HPA axes and received perioperative steroids (group B). In addition, we audited the total number of protocol violations during this period.ResultsFive patients (3.7%) in group A developed postoperative hypocortisolemia. There was no significant difference in the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leak, diabetes insipidus, or hyponatremia between both groups. There were protocol deviations in 47 (15.4%) patients. Twenty one of these patients did not receive perioperative steroids in violation of the protocol, of whom 4 (19%) developed postoperative hypocortisolemia.ConclusionsOur steroid sparing protocol was both safe and effective. The 15% incidence of protocol deviations is a reminder that the rigorous usage of checklists is mandatory for successful clinical practice.

29 keywords...

hide…