-
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM · Jan 2021
Randomized Controlled TrialCesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
- Rachel L Rodel, Kendra M Gray, Trevor E Quiner, Ana Bodea Braescu, Richard Gerkin, and Jordan H Perlow.
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Banner - University Medical Center Phoenix, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ. Electronic address: Rachel.Rodel@CUAnschutz.edu.
- Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Jan 1; 3 (1): 100271.
BackgroundCesarean delivery is the most common major surgical procedure performed in the United States. Women with class III obesity have an increased risk of cesarean delivery and have wound complication rates higher than healthy body mass index counterparts. Available evidence regarding optimal wound closure is lacking specific to the population of women with class III obesity despite a known increased rate of wound complications.ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare rates of postoperative wound complications among women with class III obesity (body mass index of ≥40 kg/m2) undergoing cesarean delivery with skin closure by either subcuticular suture or surgical staples.Study DesignPatients were randomly assigned to skin closure by nonabsorbable stainless steel surgical staples or subcuticular suture of the surgeon's choice at the time of cesarean delivery at 2 university hospitals. Randomization was stratified for scheduled vs unscheduled cesarean delivery and for the 2 study sites. The primary outcome was the rate of any documented wound complication during the first 6 weeks after delivery. Any predictors of the composite outcome that in univariate analysis had a P<.20 were entered into a forward logistic regression. Sample size was calculated based on published literature and estimating the rate of wound complications within 6 weeks of follow-up at 20% with staples and 10% with sutures. For a power of 0.80 with a 2-tailed of 0.05, a total of 199 participants per group were required.ResultsFrom September 2015 to May 2019, 232 women were randomized to staples (n=117) or sutures (n=115). Nearing the planned interim analysis, enrollment in the study was concluded administratively owing to low enrollment. With loss to follow-up and exclusions, a total of 90 women were analyzed in each group. In the suture group, one-third was closed with braided suture and two-thirds were closed with monofilament suture. Median staple removal was 5 days postoperatively. Fewer composite wound complications were noted in the surgical staples group than the subcuticular suture group (20.0% vs 27.6%), although this difference was not statistically significant (P≥.5). The rate of surgical site infection was significantly lower in the staples group (10.5% vs 22.7%; P=.041). In the multiple logistic regression, the 3 significant independent predictors of the outcome were body mass index (odds ratio, 1.08; P=.004), scheduled vs unscheduled cesarean delivery (odds ratio, 0.40; P=.018), and study site (odds ratio, 0.36; P=.028).ConclusionSurgical staples or subcuticular suture for skin closure at the time of cesarean delivery in women with a body mass index of ≥40 kg/m2 resulted in similar composite wound complication rates; however, lower cesarean wound infection rates were noted among wounds closed with staples.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.