• Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. · Mar 1998

    Blood culture contamination: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study involving 640 institutions and 497134 specimens from adult patients.

    • R B Schifman, C L Strand, F A Meier, and P J Howanitz.
    • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tucson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Ariz 85723, USA.
    • Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 1998 Mar 1; 122 (3): 216-21.

    ObjectiveTo examine clinical and laboratory practices associated with contamination of blood culture specimens from adults.Design And SettingA College of American Pathologists Q-Probes quality improvement study involving prospective evaluation of adult blood culture contamination rates in 640 institutions.Main Outcome MeasureProportion of contaminated blood cultures.ResultsA total of 497134 blood cultures were studied. The median adult inpatient blood culture contamination rate was 2.5% (central 80th percentile=0.9%-5.4%) by laboratory assessment. There was no significant difference in contamination rates between inpatient and outpatient cultures (P=.273). The median contamination rate by clinical assessment (2.1%) was significantly lower (P=.005), primarily because of a lower proportion of cultures with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus that were interpreted as contaminants when only one of multiple specimens was positive. Specimen collection variables associated with significantly lower contamination rates included use of a dedicated phlebotomy service (P=.039), use of tincture of iodine for skin disinfection (P=.036), and application of an antiseptic to the top of the collection device before inoculation (P=.018). Teaching institutions and high numbers of occupied beds were demographic factors associated with higher contamination rates for inpatients but not for outpatients. Culture parameters associated with higher contamination rates included microbial growth from a single specimen, isolation of certain microbial species (eg, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus), and longer time to detect growth in culture. Contamination rates were not significantly affected by the type of blood culture method used, specimen volume, or use of a double-needle collection procedure.ConclusionsThere is wide variation in blood culture contamination rates among institutions. Three specimen collection factors and three culture variables were identified as having a significant effect on blood culture contamination.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…