• K Takeichi, H Kasanuki, S Ohnishi, Y Endoh, and S Hosoda.
• Department of Cardiology, Heart Institute of Japan, Tokyo Women's Medical College.
• J Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1; 28 (5): 277-86.

AbstractThe usefulness and problems of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) were examined in patients with reduced heart function. Of 36 patients who received ICD for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), VT and/or VF was associated with underlying heart disease in 26 patients, and VF without underlying heart disease in 10. Of the former 26 patients, 13 with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 30% were assigned to group A, 13 with LVEF of greater than 30% to group B, and the other 10 with idiopathic VF to group C. Intraoperative death, cardiac death due to heart failure, sudden death, functional status of the ICD, exacerbation of heart failure symptoms and complications were compared between the three groups. There were no intraoperative deaths in any of the groups. During the median follow-up period of 36 +/- 22 months, there was only one sudden death in group A. There were no significant differences between the three groups. There were five cardiac deaths in group A, but none in groups B or C. The cardiac death-free rates 12, 24, and 36 months after implantation in group A were 83%, 60% and 50%, respectively. These values significantly differed from those in groups B and C (p < 0.05). The number of patients who received defibrillation therapy was higher in group A (p < 0.05). Defibrillation therapy was administered earlier in group A than in groups B and C (p < 0.05). The incidence of exacerbation of heart failure after implantation was 69%, 23% and 0% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. In group A, defibrillation therapy was administered in all patients with exacerbation of heart failure. The administration of defibrillation therapy significantly differed from that in patients without exacerbation of heart failure (p < 0.05). Exacerbation of heart failure during the postoperative acute stage occurred in both patients in group A in whom an epicardial lead system was used, but not in the four patients in group B or five in group C (p < 0.05). There were no differences in the incidence of other complications between the three groups. In group A, patients with reduced heart function, ICD greatly decreased the risk of sudden death. However, heart failure mortality remained high. Therefore, ICD may have limitations for improved prognosis. In group A patients, defibrillation therapy was administered in all patients with exacerbation of heart failure or death due to heart failure. In patients with reduced heart function, treatment for heart failure and prophylaxis of VT and/or VF should be administered.

28 keywords...

hide…