• Andrea Driscoll, Judy Currey, Joshua A Allen, Marcia George, and Patricia M Davidson.
• School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: andrea.driscoll@deakin.edu.au.
• Aust Crit Care. 2014 Feb 1; 27 (1): 17-27.

BackgroundSeveral studies have shown that the acuity and complexity of patients admitted to coronary care units is rising. Advances in medical technology and management of these patients have resulted in shorter lengths of hospital stay. Together, these changing care patterns have led to an emergence of new models of care delivery that differ from traditional coronary care units (CCU). The effect of these new models on workforce and resources in this area is unknown.AimTo describe the workforce and workplace resources of adult CCUs in Victoria, Australia.MethodThis pilot study used an investigator-developed survey to audit all adult CCUs operating in Victoria in 2010.ResultsA total of 24 CCUs participated in the audit of which the majority were located in metropolitan public hospitals. In terms of model of care of CCUs: 25% (6) of CCUs were a combination of a CCU/cardiology ward, 17% (4) a combined CCU/ICU or combined CCU/ICU/HDU and 12.5% (3) of CCUs were a dedicated unit. Only 15% (4) of all units met the international standards for a nursing workforce with critical care qualifications. The CCU/day procedure/HDU models had 24% of critical care qualified staff followed by CCU/cardiology ward model with 35% compared to an average of 54-80% of qualified staff in the other models of care of CCU.ConclusionsThis pilot study has highlighted the heterogeneity in models of CCU and a shortage of qualified critical care nurses, particularly in the CCU/cardiology ward model. This may have implications for the quality of care delivered in CCUs.Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

18 keywords...

hide…