• BJOG · Dec 2017

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Preoperative effects of mifepristone for dilation and evacuation after 19 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial.

    • K A Shaw, K Lerma, J G Shaw, K J Scrivner, M Hugin, F W Hopkins, and P D Blumenthal.
    • Division of Family Planning Services and Research, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
    • BJOG. 2017 Dec 1; 124 (13): 1973-1981.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate mifepristone as an adjunct to, or replacement for, osmotic dilators for cervical preparation in surgical abortion after 19 weeks of gestation.DesignSite-stratified, double-blinded randomised controlled trial.SettingTwo tertiary care teaching hospitals.PopulationWomen undergoing dilation and evacuation at 19-236/7 weeks of gestation from November 2013 through November 2015.MethodsParticipants were randomised to receive (1) mifepristone alone (n = 27), (2) osmotic dilators with mifepristone (n = 27) or (3) osmotic dilators with placebo (n = 21) with all receiving pre-procedure misoprostol.Main Outcome MeasuresOperative time, preoperative cervical dilation and complications.ResultsWe enrolled 75 participants; mean gestation 21 weeks. Pre-procedure cervical dilation was ≥3 cm in 4, 52, and 57% of participants in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P < 0.005). Mifepristone with misoprostol for cervical preparation resulted in longer procedure times compared with osmotic dilators, with median total procedure times of (1) 18.5 (8-52), (2) 12 (7-25), and (3) 13 (6-26) minutes (P ≤ 0.005). Excluding time required for manual dilation, procedure times were similar: median times from dilation complete to evacuation complete were (1) 10.5 (4-23), (2) 8.5 (5-24), and (3) 10 (4-20) minutes (P = 0.10). Complications occurred in seven cases, six with trainees and one with an attending physician (P = 0.03), with difference by study group not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.12).ConclusionsElimination of osmotic dilators has the potential to decrease burden and opportunity cost of cervical preparation. The longer procedure time, related to manual dilation, is offset by decreasing dilator-related preoperative time and discomfort. Provider experience may impact risk when eliminating dilators.Tweetable AbstractMifepristone and misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to D&E has potential to reduce barriers to care.© 2017 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.