• S Weckbach, C L Schlett, R C Bertheau, and H-U Kauczor.
• Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 110, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland, sabine.weckbach@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
• Internist (Berl). 2014 Sep 1; 55 (9): 1019-25.

AbstractAll findings which arise in the context of radiological diagnostics, potentially affect the health of a subject but with no intention to detect the corresponding finding are considered to be incidental radiological findings (IF). The prevalence of IFs is increasing due to the wider use of modern imaging techniques, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) in routine clinical practice and the inclusion of imaging, such as whole body MRI in large population-based cohorts. The reporting of radiological IFs can lead to further diagnostics and treatment. The management of IFs in the clinical routine is regulated by the guidelines of the various academic societies. The management of IFs in the setting of research studies differs depending on various factors, such as study design and health status of enrolled subjects. In general, IFs must be disclosed to the subject if the radiological IFs are potentially clinically relevant; however, subjects must also be protected from the consequences of false positive findings. This review article discusses radiological IFs in the setting of the clinical routine and research studies and provides a basic summary of the management recommendations for commonly occurring IFs.

9 keywords...

hide…