• Blood · Aug 2002

    Comparative Study

    Functional analysis of human hematopoietic repopulating cells mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone versus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in combination with stem cell factor.

    • David A Hess, Krysta D Levac, Francis N Karanu, Michael Rosu-Myles, Martin J White, Lisa Gallacher, Barbara Murdoch, Michael Keeney, Pamela Ottowski, Ronan Foley, Ian Chin-Yee, and Mickie Bhatia.
    • Developmental Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, John P. Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
    • Blood. 2002 Aug 1; 100 (3): 869-78.

    AbstractUsing in vitro progenitor assays, serum-free in vitro cultures, and the nonobese diabetic/severe combined immune-deficient (NOD/SCID) ecotropic murine virus knockout xenotransplantation model to detect human SCID repopulating cells (SRCs) with multilineage reconstituting function, we have characterized and compared purified subpopulations harvested from the peripheral blood (PB) of patients receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with stem cell factor (SCF). Mobilized G-CSF plus SCF PB showed a 2-fold increase in total mononuclear cell content and a 5-fold increase in CD34-expressing cells depleted for lineage-marker expression (CD34(+)Lin(-)) as compared with patients treated with G-CSF alone. Functionally, G-CSF plus SCF-mobilized CD34(+)CD38(-)Lin(-) cells contained a 2-fold enhancement in progenitor frequency as compared with G-CSF-mobilized subsets. Despite enhanced cellularity and progenitor capacity, G-CSF plus SCF mobilization did not increase the frequency of SRCs as determined by limiting dilution analysis by means of unfractionated PB cells. Purification of SRCs from these sources demonstrated that as few as 1000 CD34(+)CD38(-)Lin(-) cells from G-CSF-mobilized PB contained SRC capacity while G-CSF plus SCF-mobilized CD34(+)CD38(-)Lin(-) cells failed to repopulate at doses up to 500 000 cells. In addition, primitive CD34(-)CD38(-)AC133(+)Lin(-) cells derived from G-CSF plus SCF-mobilized PB were capable of differentiation into CD34-expressing cells, while the identical subfractions from G-CSF PB were unable to produce CD34(+) cells in serum-free cultures. Our study defines qualitative and quantitative distinctions among subsets of primitive cells mobilized by means of G-CSF plus SCF versus G-CSF alone, and therefore has implications for the utility of purified repopulating cells from these sources.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.