• Yong-Sheng Xu, Hai-Feng Liu, Da-Li Xi, Jin-Kui Li, Zhao Liu, Rui-Feng Yan, and Jun-Qiang Lei.
• Department of Radiology, First Hospital of LanZhou University, No. 1, Donggang West Road, Chengguan District, Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000, People's Republic of China.
• Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Sep 1; 44 (9): 3089-3098.

PurposeThe study evaluated the relationship between the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the histogram-derived parameters of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained from the whole-lesion assessment of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the liver.MethodsA total of 51 patients were included. The parameters were correlated with the Edmondson-Steiner grades by using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ). The differences of ADC parameters between different tumor histological grades were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. The extent to which each parameter aided in differentiating tumors with poor performance (III, IV) and fair performance (I, II) was assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az).ResultsThe 25th percentile ADC exhibits the most negative correlation with histological grade (ρ = - 0.397), followed by the 30th percentile ADC (ρ = - 0.395), the minimum ADC value (ρ = - 0.390) and the 20th percentile ADC (ρ = - 0.385), whereas the minimum ADC value yielded the highest Az (0.763) in the discrimination of tumor foci with poor differentiation from fairly differentiated HCCs. The minimum ADC of 4.15 × 10-3 mm2/s or lower was considered to indicate poorly differentiated performance, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 66.7 and 90.9%, respectively.ConclusionThe 25th percentile ADC showed a stronger correlation with the histological grade of HCC than other ADC parameters, and the minimum ADC value might be an optimal metric for determining poor and fair differentiations of HCC in DWI.

22 keywords...

hide…