-
- Tiffany J Braley, Galit Levi Dunietz, Ronald D Chervin, Lynda D Lisabeth, Lesli E Skolarus, and James F Burke.
- Sleep Disorders Center, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul 1; 66 (7): 1296-1302.
ObjectivesTo estimate the proportion of older Americans at risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who receive OSA evaluations, diagnosis, and treatment.DesignCross sectional study.SettingNational Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), Round 3 survey.ParticipantsCommunity-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older (N=1,052).MeasurementsNHATS participants were asked specific questions about sleep disturbances, including items that resembled critical elements of a validated instrument used to assess OSA risk (the STOP-Bang questionnaire). The proportion of older Americans at risk for OSA who received evaluations with home or in-laboratory sleep studies, OSA diagnosis, and OSA treatment was examined, as well as clinical, social, and demographic correlates of OSA.ResultsOf 1,052 participants who completed the sleep module, 56% (95% confidence interval (CI)=53-59%) were estimated to be at high risk of OSA. Only 8% (95% CI=5-11%) of the high-risk individuals had been tested for it. Of those tested, 94% (95% CI=87-100%) were diagnosed with OSA. Treatment with positive airway pressure was prescribed for 82% (95% CI=65-99%) of participants with an OSA diagnosis.ConclusionsEvidence from this nationally representative sample of community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries suggests that high OSA risk is common but seldom investigated. When investigated, OSA is almost always confirmed and usually treated. These findings suggest a significant gap in OSA assessment for older Americans that could have public health implications.© 2018, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2018, The American Geriatrics Society.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.