-
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd · Jul 1998
[A large-scale diagnostic program for the fragile X-syndrome among the mentally retarded. II. Implications for parents and family].
- L B de Vries, H J Duivenvoorden, A Tibben, and M F Niermeijer.
- Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam-Dijkzigt/Erasmus Universiteit,afd. Klinische Genetica, Rotterdam.
- Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Jul 18; 142 (29): 1672-5.
ObjectiveStudying the attitudes and reactions of (non)consenting parents/guardians of mentally retarded patients regarding the screening programme for the fragile X syndrome in the Netherlands.DesignObservative-descriptive.SettingDepartment of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital Dijkzigt and Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.MethodSince 1992 a screening program for the fragile X syndrome has been conducted in 5 institutions giving residential care (1869 individuals) and 16 special schools (1483 children) in the southwestern Netherlands. Patients with an unknown cause for their mental handicap were, after the parents/guardians' written consent, briefly examined physically and a blood sample for DNA analysis of the FMRI gene was taken. The attitude and reactions of (non)consenting parents/guardians were assessed by pre- and post-test questionnaires. Of the 1531 persons who consented, 1090 were sent a letter before the test (response: 860; 79%) and 1030 after the test results (response: 681; 66%); of the 435 parents/guardians who had not consented, 153 (35%) responded.ResultsSeventy percent (1531/2189) of the parents/guardians consented to testing. Major motives to participate in the screening were the wish to obtain a diagnosis (82%), the hereditary implications (80%), and the support of research into mental retardation (81%). The majority of consenting parents/guardians (84%) as well as of non-consenting parents/guardians (78%) discussed the DNA test with other relatives. Major reasons for non-consenting were the blood test which was considered too stressful for their relative (61%) and the opinion that a 'definite' cause of the mental handicap in their relative was already known (44%). These parents/guardians were not opposed to genetic testing in general (72%). Of the consenting parents/guardians 34% would actively seek further investigations after exclusion of the fragile X syndrome in their relative.ConclusionThe fragile X screening programme was rated positively by parents/guardians.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.