• A L Siu, R L Kravitz, E Keeler, K Hemmerling, R Kington, J W Davis, A Mitchell, T M Burton, H Morgenstern, M H Beers, and D B Reuben.
• Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
• Arch Intern Med. 1996 Jan 8; 156 (1): 76-81.

BackgroundThe diffusion of comprehensive geriatric assessment services has been rather limited in North America partly because of reimbursement and organizational constraints.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of a comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention for frail older patients that is started before hospital discharge and is continued at home.MethodsPatients older than 65 years were selected who had either unstable medical problems, recent functional limitations, or potentially reversible geriatric clinical problems. Patients (n = 354) were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or a control group. Information on survival, readmissions, nursing home placement, medication use, and health status was collected at 30 and 60 days after hospital discharge.ResultsNo differences were observed between the two treatment groups in survival, hospital readmission, or nursing home placement by 60 days. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, no significant differences were observed between the two groups on measures of physical functioning, social functioning, role limitations, health perceptions, pain, mental health, energy and/or fatigue, health change, or overall well-being.ConclusionsAlthough efficacy has been demonstrated for some forms of comprehensive geriatric assessment, the types of services that are easier to establish (inpatient consultation services and ambulatory assessment) have not been shown to improve outcomes. Our results indicate that outcomes are unaffected by a limited form of comprehensive geriatric assessment begun in the hospital and completed at home. Further efforts are needed to develop and to evaluate realistic approaches to comprehensive geriatric assessment.

5 keywords...

hide…