-
- J Blic and P Scheinmann.
- Hôpital des Enfants Malades, 149 rue de Sèvres, Paris, 75015, France.
- Paediatr Respir Rev. 2000 Dec 1; 1 (4): 368-71.
AbstractThe inability to accurately predict the outcome of infants with recurrent wheezy bronchitis makes the early use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) controversial. Data from bronchoalveolar lavages and epidemiological surveys suggest a persistent inflammation of the airways in the more severe cases. Prospective studies, mostly with nebulized corticosteroids, have demonstrated clinical efficacy on daytime and nightime symptoms, reduced requirements for rescue bronchodilators and a real steroid sparing effect. In infants with episodic viral-associated wheeze with or without interval symptoms, ICS use carries the risk of overtreatment and of adverse effects. Long-term prospective studies are urgently required to assess the efficacy and safety of ICS and their possible effects on the natural history of infantile asthma.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..