• Brian S W Chong, Thomas Tran, Julian Druce, Susan A Ballard, Julie A Simpson, and Mike Catton.
• Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Melbourne Health at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. Electronic address: bcswen86@gmail.com.
• Pathology. 2020 Dec 1; 52 (7): 796-800.

AbstractThe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has significantly increased demand on laboratory throughput and reagents for nucleic acid extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Reagent shortages may limit the expansion of testing required to scale back containment measures. The aims of this study were to investigate the viability of sample pooling as a strategy for increasing test throughput and conserving PCR reagents; and to report our early experience with pooling of clinical samples. A pre-implementation study was performed to assess the sensitivity and theoretical efficiency of two, four, and eight-sample pools in a real-time reverse transcription PCR-based workflow. A standard operating procedure was developed and implemented in two laboratories during periods of peak demand, inclusive of over 29,000 clinical samples processed in our laboratory. Sensitivity decreased (mean absolute increase in cycle threshold value of 0.6, 2.3, and 3.0 for pools of two, four, and eight samples, respectively) and efficiency increased as pool size increased. Gains from pooling diminished at high disease prevalence. Our standard operating procedure was successfully implemented across two laboratories. Increased workflow complexity imparts a higher risk of errors, and requires risk mitigation strategies. Turnaround time for individual samples increased, hence urgent samples should not be pooled. Pooling is a viable strategy for high-throughput testing of SARS-CoV-2 in low-prevalence settings.Copyright © 2020 Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…