• Michael Nair-Collins.
• Florida State University College of Medicine, Tallahassee, Florida, USA michael.nair-collins@med.fsu.edu.
• J Med Philos. 2015 Oct 1; 40 (5): 554-83.

AbstractIn this essay I examine the formal structure of the concept of futility, enabling identification of the appropriate roles played by patient, professional, and society. I argue that the concept of futility does not justify unilateral decisions to forego life-sustaining medical treatment over patient or legitimate surrogate objection, even when futility is determined by a process or subject to ethics committee review. Furthermore, I argue for a limited positive ethical obligation on the part of health care professionals to assist patients in achieving certain restricted goals, including the preservation of life, even in circumstances in which most would agree that that life is of no benefit to the patient. Finally, I address the objection that professional integrity overrides this limited obligation and find the objection unconvincing. In short, my aim in this essay is to see the concept of futility finally buried, once and for all. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy Inc.

15 keywords...

hide…