-
Clinical Trial
Burn depth assessment using hyperspectral imaging in a prospective single center study.
- Torsten Schulz, Jörg Marotz, Sebastian Seider, Stefan Langer, Sebastian Leuschner, and Frank Siemers.
- Department of Orthopedic, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, Leipzig University Hospital, Germany. Electronic address: torsten.schulz1988@gmail.com.
- Burns. 2022 Aug 1; 48 (5): 1112-1119.
BackgroundThe assessment of thermal burn depth remains challenging. Over the last decades, several optical systems were developed to determine burn depth. So far, only laser doppler imaging (LDI) has been shown to be reliable while others such as infrared thermography or spectrophotometric intracutaneous analysis have been less accurate. The aim of our study is to evaluate hyperspectral imaging (HSI) as a new optical device.MethodsPatients suffering thermal trauma treated in a burn unit in Germany between November 2019 and September 2020 were included. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years, 2nd or 3rd degree thermal burns, written informed consent and presentation within 24 h after injury. Clinical assessment and hyperspectral imaging were performed 24, 48 and 72 h after the injury. Patients in whom secondary wound closure was complete within 21 days (group A) were compared to patients in whom secondary wound closure took more than 21 days or where skin grafting was indicated (group B). Demographic data and the primary parameters generated by HSI were documented. A Mann Whitney-U test was performed to compare the groups. A p-value below 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. The data generated using HSI were combined to create the HSI burn index (BI). Using a logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) sensitivity and specificity of the BI were calculated. The trial was officially registered on DRKS (registration number: DRKS00022843).ResultsOverall, 59 patients with burn wounds were eligible for inclusion. Ten patients were excluded because of a poor data quality. Group A comprised 36 patients with a mean age of 41.5 years and a mean burnt body surface area of 2.7%. In comparison, 13 patients were allocated to group B because of the need for a skin graft (n = 10) or protracted secondary wound closure lasting more than 21 days. The mean age of these patients was 46.8 years. They had a mean affected body surface area of 4.0%. 24, 48, and 72 h after trauma the BI was 1.0 ± 0.28, 1.2 ± 0.29 and 1.55 ± 0.27 in group A and 0.78 ± 0.14, 1.05 ± 0.23 and 1.23 ± 0.27 in group B. At every time point significant differences were demonstrated between the groups. At 24 h, ROC analysis demonstrated BI threshold of 0.95 (sensitivity 0.61/specificity 1.0), on the second day of 1.17 (sensitivity 0.51/specificity 0.81) and on the third day of 1.27 (sensitivity 0.92/specificity 0.71).ConclusionChanges in microcirculation within the first 72 h after thermal trauma were reflected by an increasing BI in both groups. After 72 h, the BI is able to predict the need for a skin graft with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 71%.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.