-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jul 2023
Randomized Controlled TrialMitral repair with leaflet preservation versus leaflet resection and ventricular reverse remodeling from a randomized trial.
- Makoto Hibino, Nitish K Dhingra, Subodh Verma, Vincent Chan, Adrian Quan, Alexander J Gregory, ChuMichael W AMWADivision of Cardiac Surgery, London Health Sciences Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada., Geraldine Ong, Hwee Teoh, C David Mazer, Wendy Tsang, David Messika-Zeitoun, Howard Leong-Poi, Kim A Connelly, and CAMRA Trial CardioLink-2 Collaborators.
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: mhibino-ngy@umin.org.
- J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2023 Jul 1; 166 (1): 7483.e274-83.e2.
ObjectivesIn the Canadian Mitral Research Alliance (CAMRA) Trial CardioLink-2 leaflet resection versus preservation techniques for posterior leaflet prolapse was investigated and no difference was shown in their effect on mean mitral gradient at peak exercise at 12 months postoperatively. The purpose of this subanalysis was to evaluate the effect of the 2 strategies on left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling after repair.MethodsA total of 104 patients were randomized to either a leaflet resection or leaflet preservation strategy. Echocardiograms, performed at baseline (preoperative), predischarge, and 12 months postoperatively, were analyzed in a blinded fashion at a core laboratory.ResultsAll patients underwent successful mitral repair. At discharge, 3 patients showed moderate mitral regurgitation, whereas the remainder showed mild or less regurgitation. Compared with the baseline echocardiogram, the indexed end diastolic volume was reduced at the discharge echocardiogram (P < .0001) and was further reduced at the 12-month echocardiogram (P = .01). In contrast, the indexed end systolic volume did not significantly change from baseline assessed at the predischarge echocardiogram (P = .32) but improved at 12 months postoperatively (P < .0001), resulting in a corresponding improvement in ejection fraction at 12 months (P < .0001). The type of mitral repair strategy had no significant effect on LV reverse remodeling trends.ConclusionsThe mitral repair strategies used did not influence postoperative LV reverse remodeling, which occurred in stages. Although LV end diastolic dimensions recovered before discharge, improvements in LV end systolic dimension were evident 12 months after repair.Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.