• Clin. Chim. Acta · Nov 2020

    Harmonization of two hs-cTnI methods based on recalibration of measured quality control and clinical samples.

    • Aldo Clerico, Martina Zaninotto, Andrea Padoan, Rudina Ndreu, Veronica Musetti, Silvia Masotti, Concetta Prontera, Claudio Passino, Carlo ZucchelliGianGCNR Institute of Clinical Physiology and CNR spin-off QualiMedLab, Pisa, Italy., Mario Plebani, and Marco Migliardi.
    • Fondazione CNR-Regione Toscana, G. Monasterio, and Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy. Electronic address: clerico@ftgm.it.
    • Clin. Chim. Acta. 2020 Nov 1; 510: 150-156.

    BackgroundThe study aim was to evaluate whether is possible to harmonize the results of two hs-cTnI methods using a recalibration procedure based on linear regression models and measured values of external quality assessment (EQA) and clinical samples.MethodsA two-step experimental approach was used. The preliminary step was performed using 16 EQA samples. The harmonization procedure was then validated by using 2530 heparinized plasma samples collected by 12 Italian University and Regional Hospitals from apparently healthy volunteers and patients admitted to emergency department with cardiac diseases. Two hs-cTnI methods were tested: Architect Stat High Sensitive Troponin-I, and the Access hs-cTnI using DxI platform. Linear regression models based on mean values measured with the two hs-cTni methods were used.ResultsA significant reduction in the measurement bias between the two methods was found after recalibration procedure. The agreement between-methods improved of about 2.5 folds after recalibration, as assessed by reduction in mean CV values from 38.4% (SD 25.9%) before recalibration to 15.0% (SD 10.6%) after recalibration for hs-cTnI values ≤ 500 ng/L (n = 13, P = 0.0111 by non-parametric test for paired data).ConclusionsA recalibration procedure based on means of measured concentrations with hs-cTnI methods, which use monoclonal antibodies with similar binding characteristics, can be used to significantly reduce systematic bias and so to improve harmonization between methods. The results of this study can aid laboratorians and clinicians to better compare the concentrations respectively measured with the Architect and Access hs-cTnI methods.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.