• Sabrina G Fabi, Mitchel P Goldman, Daniel C Mills, W Philip Werschler, Jeremy B Green, Joely Kaufman, Robert A Weiss, and Carl S Hornfeldt.
• *Dermatology Cosmetic Laser Medical Associates of La Jolla, San Diego, California; †Aesthetic Plastic Surgical Institute, Laguna Beach, California; ‡Premier Clinical Research, Spokane, Washington; §Skin Associates of South Florida, Coral Gables, Florida; ‖Maryland Laser Skin and Vein Institute, Hunt Valley, Maryland; ¶Apothekon Inc., Woodbury, Minnesota.
• Dermatol Surg. 2016 May 1; 42 Suppl 2: S168-76.

BackgroundA microfocused ultrasound system with visualization (MFU-V) is currently indicated for use as a noninvasive dermatological aesthetic treatment to lift the eyebrows, lax submental and neck tissue, and improve lines and wrinkles of the décolleté.ObjectiveTo determine the existence of any safety signals when combining MFU-V with botulinum toxin-A and/or semipermanent and temporary dermal fillers.Materials And MethodsA retrospective chart review was performed using subjects who received aesthetic treatments including incobotulinumtoxinA injection, cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid (CPM HA) dermal fillers, and calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) dermal fillers within 6 months of treatment with MFU-V in the same or different anatomic areas.ResultsAll subjects (N = 101; 96 female; 25-70 year old) received MFU-V, 18% received incobotulinumtoxinA injections, and 81% were treated with CPM HA and/or CaHA fillers. Seven adverse events (7%) were reported: bruising/purpura (n = 4), swelling (n = 1), paresthesia (n = 1), and herpes simplex virus (HSV) outbreak (n = 1). Only the HSV outbreak was considered to be related to combined treatments.ConclusionAlthough limited by relatively few subjects, the results of the present study suggest that the safety profile of MFU-V combined with other aesthetic products is consistent with the safety profiles of the individual treatments.

33 keywords...

hide…