• Indian pediatrics · Jul 2021

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Epinephrine Plus Vasopressin vs Epinephrine Plus Placebo in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Clinical Trial.

    • Abraar Sheriff, Ramachandran Rameshkumar, Muthu Chidambaram, Kaushik Maulik, Routhu Santhosh Kumar, Atahar Jamal, Rohit Bhowmick, Niranjan Biswal, and Subramanian Mahadevan.
    • Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry.
    • Indian Pediatr. 2021 Jul 15; 58 (7): 624-630.

    ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of epinephrine plus vasopressin vs epinephrine plus placebo in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).DesignRandomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial.SettingPICU in a tertiary care institute from February, 2019 to May, 2020.ParticipantsChildren aged one month to 13 years who required CPR during PICU stay. Patients in whom vascular access was not available or return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved by defibrillation without epinephrine were excluded.InterventionPatients were randomized to receive vasopressin 0.1 mL per kg (=0.8 unit per kg) or placebo (0.1 mL per kg normal saline) in addition to epinephrine (1:10000) 0.1 mL per kg. The drugs were given as bolus doses every three minutes until the ROSC or up to a maximum of five doses, whichever was earlier.Outcome MeasureThe primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved ROSC. The secondary outcomes were survival rate and functional status (at 24-hour, PICU, hospital, and 90-day post-discharge), need for organ supports, length of stay (PICU and hospital), and adverse effect(s) of the study drugs.Results90 patients (epinephrine plus vasopressin group, n=45 and epinephrine plus placebo group, n=45) were analyzed on intention-to-treat basis. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between epinephrine plus vasopressin (n=25, 55.5%) and epinephrine plus placebo groups (n=24, 53.3%) (Relative risk 1.04, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.52). There was no significant difference in survival rate at 24-hour (n=7, 15.6% vs. n=8, 17.8%), at PICU, hospital, and 90-day post-discharge (n=1, 2.2% vs n=1, 2.2%). There was no difference in other secondary outcomes. No trial drug-related serious adverse events were observed.ConclusionsA combination of epinephrine plus vasopressin did not improve the rate of return of spontaneous circulation in the pediatric intensive care unit cardiopulmonary resuscitation as compared with epinephrine plus placebo.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…