• Ben Indja, Kei Woldendorp, Michael P Vallely, and Stuart M Grieve.
• 1 Sydney Translational Imaging Laboratory Heart Research Institute Charles Perkins Centre The University of Sydney Camperdown Sydney NSW Australia.
• J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7; 8 (9): e010920.

AbstractBackground Silent brain infarcts ( SBI ) are increasingly being recognized as an important complication of cardiac procedures as well as a potential surrogate marker for studies on brain injury. The extent of subclinical brain injury is poorly defined. Methods and Results We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis utilizing studies of SBI s and focal neurologic deficits following cardiac procedures. Our final analysis included 42 studies with 49 separate intervention groups for a total of 2632 patients. The prevalence of SBI s following transcatheter aortic valve implantation was 0.71 (95% CI 0.64-0.77); following aortic valve replacement 0.44 (95% CI 0.31-0.57); in a mixed cardiothoracic surgery group 0.39 (95% CI 0.28-0.49); coronary artery bypass graft 0.25 (95% CI 0.15-0.35); percutaneous coronary intervention 0.14 (95% CI 0.10-0.19); and off-pump coronary artery bypass 0.14 (0.00-0.58). The risk ratio of focal neurologic deficits to SBI in aortic valve replacement was 0.22 (95% CI 0.15-0.32); in off-pump coronary artery bypass 0.21 (95% CI 0.02-2.04); with mixed cardiothoracic surgery 0.15 (95% CI 0.07-0.33); coronary artery bypass graft 0.10 (95% CI 0.05-0.18); transcatheter aortic valve implantation 0.10 (95% CI 0.07-0.14); and percutaneous coronary intervention 0.06 (95% CI 0.03-0.14). The mean number of SBI s per patient was significantly higher in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation group (4.58 ± 2.09) compared with both the aortic valve replacement group (2.16 ± 1.62, P=0.03) and the percutaneous coronary intervention group (1.88 ± 1.02, P=0.03). Conclusions SBI s are a very common complication following cardiac procedures, particularly those involving the aortic valve. The high frequency of SBI s compared with strokes highlights the importance of recording this surrogate measure in cardiac interventional studies. We suggest that further work is required to standardize reporting in order to facilitate the use of SBI s as a routine outcome measure.

24 keywords...

hide…