• Patricia B Mullan, David E Weissman, Bruce Ambuel, and Charles von Gunten.
• Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
• J Palliat Med. 2002 Aug 1;5(4):487-96.

BackgroundIntegrating end-of-life care (EOL) education into medical residency programs requires knowledge of what programs currently teach and what residents learn.ObjectiveEvaluate EOL teaching content and practices in internal medicine residency programs and the EOL knowledge of their faculty and residents.DesignAn interinstitutional pilot study. We examined patterns of EOL education, discerned from program directors' responses to structured surveys of institutional teaching and evaluation practices, and EOL knowledge, derived from the performance of faculty and residents on a 36-item knowledge examination.SubjectsProgram directors, faculty, and residents at 32 accredited U.S. internal medicine residency programs.ResultsAlthough all programs cited inclusion of some EOL education, expected EOL domains were not systematically taught or assessed. Pain assessment and treatment training was required in only 60% of programs. Even fewer programs required instruction on nonpain symptoms (<30%) or hospice and nonhospital care settings (22%). EOL assessment depends primarily on faculty's general ratings of residents' global competency; few programs use knowledge examinations or structured skill assessments. Directors identified barriers and support for improving education. On the knowledge examination, the mean score of residents increased across training levels (F = 21.7, p < .001), and the mean score of faculty was higher than residents' (57.6%: 48.9%, t = 51.6, p < .001).ConclusionsExisting internal medicine residency education lacks training in critical EOL care domains. Residency programs need additional training for residents and teaching faculty in EOL content and skills, with assessment practices that demonstrate competencies have been acquired. Program directors perceive institutional support for making these changes.

10 keywords...

hide…