• Manuel Montero-Odasso, David B Hogan, Robert Lam, Kenneth Madden, Christopher MacKnight, Frank Molnar, and Kenneth Rockwood.
• Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medicine and Division of Geriatric Medicine, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON.
• Can Geriatr J. 2020 Mar 1; 23 (1): 152-154.

BackgroundThe Canadian Geriatrics Society (CGS) fosters the health and well-being of older Canadians and older adults worldwide. Although severe COVID-19 illness and significant mortality occur across the lifespan, the fatality rate increases with age, especially for people over 65 years of age. The dichotomization of COVID-19 patients by age has been proposed as a way to decide who will receive intensive care admission when critical care unit beds or ventilators are limited. We provide perspectives and evidence why alternative approaches should be used.MethodsPractitioners and researchers in geriatric medicine and gerontology have led in the development of alternative approaches to using chronological age as the sole criterion for allocating medical resources. Evidence and ethical based recommendations are provided.ResultsAge alone should not drive decisions for health-care resource allocation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Decisions on health-care resource allocation should take into consideration the preferences of the patient and their goals of care, as well as patient factors like the Clinical Frailty Scale score based on their status two weeks before the onset of symptoms.ConclusionsAge alone does not accurately capture the variability of functional capacities and physiological reserve seen in older adults. A threshold of 5 or greater on the Clinical Frailty Scale is recommended if this scale is utilized in helping to decide on access to limited health-care resources such as admission to a critical care unit and/or intubation during the COVID-19 pandemic.© 2020 Author(s). Published by the Canadian Geriatrics Society.

4 keywords...

hide…